LogoSm
LogoLg
rotatingimage
SPACER Home > Bioelectronics > Frequencies and Anecdotes > Frequency Reports
 

Rife Frequency Reports

==================

Hi

All results are from independent research by various individuals with a Bare plasma tube unit. All information is not intended to refute any other researchers results, but simply to report these efforts to provide additional information in the area of Plasma Emission Frequency Technology. An attempt was made to standardize the setup and the operating procedures to aid in the evaluation of the basic Bare unit. Only two units were employed. The basic unit and a compact unit. 

No differences were detected between the two units with regard to their effectiveness. Effectiveness was determined solely by the positive changes in the physical symptoms. I.E., the symptoms were reduced or alleviated. Both units were consistant in operations and in the results achieved. In most cases, the results were dramatic in the initial results. Initial rapid improvements could be seen or reported by the researcher.

Approximately 95% of all persons did not experience adverse Detox reactions. Detox was in general very mild, if it occurred at all.
80% did not have any initial response to the X-Wave.

90% exposed experienced a immediate reduction or alleviation of symptoms due to changes in their physical condition.

Followups results, show, 90% of all persons exposed to the plasma tube have experienced complete alleviation of bacterial and viral conditions with no reoccurances, except where original condition was noot completely resolved or reinfection possibly occured. 

Some CA subjects have experienced complete alleviation of symptoms within 30 days. Some CA subjects were too far advanced, cancer had invaded too many areas, to be able to help. All CA subjects require supervision.

Subjects who use the plasma tube, experience, essentially, complete freedom from colds and flu.

Subjects who use Clark Zappers, for non CA, experience reoccurances of colds and flu symptoms, but rapid alleviation is achieved with use of zapper on a daily basis.

Indications are that, the use of a zapper in conjunction with a plasma tube is additive and can achieve faster results.

100% experienced positive symptomatic responses with Zapper.

Indications are that a combination of a plasma tube and a Pad or Zapper, used on alternate days, might achieve quicker positive symptomatic responses.

There are no references that Rife cured subjects in just seconds. There has been entirely too much assumptions and conjecture regarding the Rife Tube and The Bare tube units and the killing rates. The question is does it work? Emphatically, Yes it works! 

I have seen and am convinced that the Bare plasma tube is very effective against cancer and bacteria and other pathogens. Thus far, penetration problems have not been a problem.Some bacterial conditions resolved in 15 to 20 minutes.

The basic problem seems to be the frequency, the dwell time, and the frequency of the sessions.

Symptomatic techniques are required to successfully conduct exposure programs to achieve positive results. Detox reactions are not required for positive results. Detox reactions does not indicate resolution of problem.

I have found that positive symptomatic responses are the key to progress and not Detox reactions. If there are no positive symptomatic responses then the program is not correct and one or more of the parameters must be changed.

MRI's are not a 100% assurance that the CA problem has been overcome. All symptoms must be taken into account in the overall program. Associative pathogenic contributions must be addressed early in the program, however they must be minimized and secondary to CA to avoid adverse Detox.

Progressive, aggressive exposures, dwell times, and frequency of sessions are necessary to assure positive results and to help minimize adverse Detox reactions. 

Associated contributors to the physical conditions must be addressed, specifically, fungus, yeast, bacteria, viruses, and parasites.

The Basic Bare unit apparently is capable of addressing all conditions if the correct frequencies are known and used properly. So far, I only recommend the use of the standard straight or "U" leaded glass tube filled with 100% Argon at the normal pressure of 6mm.

14 gauge, bare, solid Copper coils, 4 turns each, wound CCW and CW, 4 inches from tips of tube. No heating problems experienced. 

Unit can be operated continously. All standard components per Bare manual, except as noted. Uniden Pro 510 XL CB mods are cut d-14, R-93, and solder bridge. Burton switch subtituted for mike FG output set at 0.250mv. 6 ft RG58 /U coax from Radio Shack between Kinnaman and Switch box. Switch box connected to CB. Astron SS-25 switching power supply. 20 amps continously. Small FM radio, set to 108 FM, to check CB output only.

No attempt is made to use a scope or other devices to check unit performance. Primary symptomatic responses are used to determine units effectiveness. No response to X-wave is required nor is a weak, mild, or strong response to the X-wave considered. 

No attempt has been made to use any other tubes, tube orientations, or components, because effectiveness of standard setup appears to be more than adequate. The goal is to evaluate standard setup to provide a positive means against pathogens and abnormal cellular function as in the case of cancer.

The ultimate goal is not to cause massive evisceration, if possible, but to aid in reversing or alleviating the cause of normal cell to become cancerous, so that the body's normal immune system can get rid of the wastes without logjamming the circulatory system and various organs.

Total cancer mass plays an important part in this plan. Normally surgery reduces the mass, which is an advantage. However, Chemo and radiation, are detrimental to the recovery program and should be avoided if possible. 

In general, subjects who refuse surgery, Chemo, and radiation, respond more rapidly and positively. Degree of CA involvement and total CA mass directly affect the results. The more CA involvement with other organs and the greater the CA mass, the more difficult the task.

This is not a simple task. No CA researcher should be on their own. Supervision is mandatory. Even medical doctors are poorly equipped to manage their own situations. Judgments are often clouded.

My recommendations: start researching with the basic unit

Paul

-------------------------


STATUS REPORT

Dear Fellow Researchers

The following results are provided as information regarding the operation of a basic Bare unit, except where deviations are noted. These variations are not intended to encourage deviation from Bare's basic recommendations. It is apparent that many variables exist with all the units in the field and various successes have been achieved with them. 

Results from volunteers this year has been 100% effective in reduction of symptoms for microbial infections and cancers, specifically, multiple myeloma (MM) and Gliobasthoma carcinoma (GL). One MM shows complete remission. The second, a bone marrow test showed significant reduction in cancer.

A rare form of Cancer of brain stem, (Cardoma) is under research presently. Significant "associated contributor" involvement has resulted in adverse reactions, but they are diminishing. Volunteer is confident of progress. Tumor was diagnosed inoperable and growing. MRI will be used to confirm any progress.

A volunteer with Choroidal Melanoma, Choroid membrane behind eye, tumor is under study. Responses to the latter two have been significant, but no conclusions have been made. Waiting for MRIs to confirm any progress and results.

Microbial infections responded to the standard freqs 728, 787, 880 for 5 minutes each. Distance from tube is normally 6 to 10 feet. 

Power output can vary from 30 to 70 watts and still be effective. Thus far effectiveness and penetration has not been a problem even at the lower wattage. SWRs ranged from 1.0 to 2.0 and were all effective.

Cooling of all components is the key for reliable operation.

Tube shapes are standard leaded glass, 22" long, straight or U with 100% argon. Lighting of the tubes was easy without any problems.

Connection to tubes is by 14 gauge bare copper coils with 4 turns each. Coils are wound CCW and CW. Coils are placed approximately. 4" from the tips of tube. 12 or 10 gauge wire can be used, but they are more difficult to wind or shape. 

Connection to coils is by 10 gauge stranded "Power Cable" or 10 gauge "Monster Cable" 9 to 12 inches long and are to the outside ends of the coils. Wire lugs are soldered to the ends that connect to the Balun or Tuner.

The Balun used is the Amidon Torrid Balun Kit. The Balun core can be wound with 11, 18, or 22 bifial turns. There doesn't seem to be much difference.

Coax RG58/U connections, CB (3" to 6") to Palomar and Palomar (9" to 12") to Tuner are kept as short as possible.

Palomar, Blue faced and Black faced, work equally as well with no overheating problems, provided adequate cooling is provided. Fan on top and on bottom. High output Palomar settings are never required. 

CB modifications used are cutting D-14 diode, R-93 resistor, and solder bridge. 

Power to Kinnaman is provided from CB with diodes to reduce voltage from 12 volts to 9 volts. However the Kinnaman will tolerate 12 volts, but it is always better to operate on the lower voltage. 

Kinnaman provides smooth uninterrupted operation for the whole exposure session with minimal inputs. Gated mode is recommended for all sessions. All Kinnaman F1A, F1B, F1C have a gated mode and they are all effective. The latest Version, F1C, allows one to eliminate the 12-second pause between programmed frequencies.

Microbial study indicated that staph within the body is more readily disposed of than when isolated outside the body.

Microbial specimens placed 6ft, 12 ft, and 18 ft exposed for the standard 728, 787, 880 for 5 minutes exhibited regrowth in a controlled environment chamber after 24 hrs.

Volunteers exposed to the same regimen experience total absence of symptoms after one exposure with no reoccurrence in 1 to 7 days. In one case exposure was repeated for 3 days. After 7 days tracking was terminated. No signs of reinfection were exhibited. 

Normally, sessions should account for "associated contributors" to the physical condition to effectively achieve positive results. Bacterial, fungal, parasitic, and viral aspects must all be considered.

Most lists contain these frequencies. It is up to the individual researcher to examine the lists and confirmation is required.

Detoxification must be closely monitored and action must be taken to make corrections to the exposure program to minimize and alleviate any adverse reactions. This action involves the time of individual exposures and/or how often the exposures are conducted..

MRI confirmation of the reduction or elimination of cancer mass has demonstrated the effectiveness of this technology in multiple myeloma and Gliobasthoma carcinoma. 

Several techniques are circulating around and each one is valid within their own specifications. 

Where possible, it is recommended to use a progressive or increasing the time of exposures for each CA frequency with time, and an aggressive, using initial exposures time of a minimum of 5 minutes for each CA frequency, approach for cancer.

Basic cancer (CA) frequencies, 2008 and 2128 are used for 5 minutes each initially and run every day for the first 40 days, if no adverse Detox reactions are experienced. Time of exposure may be increased at each exposure by 1 minute until 30 or 40 minutes each is achieved. A volunteer supervisor is highly recommended to assure the program is followed. 

Fungus and yeast frequencies, 465 and 784, 5 minutes each initially are run the first day along with the CA frequencies. After that they are run every other day. These frequencies may be tapered off to an occasional status.

Close attention to reactions or responses to the initial exposures and subsequent exposures must be done. Every effort must be made to minimize and eliminate adverse reactions by reduction of time of exposure and increasing the time between exposures.

Depending upon the type, size, and location of the tumor, all symptoms must be accounted. In no case, should the aggressiveness of the CA frequencies be eliminated or stopped because of symptoms related to the tumor. The differences between symptoms and Detox must be understood. 

Paul


Status Report 5/12/98

----- End Included Message -----


This tumor involves at least 75% of the breast tissue and has erupted through the skin.

This lady is very sensitive to the "beam", and can detect response in the breast lesion.

We have spent a lot of time attempting to isolate those frequencies that she responds to, especially in the tumor region.

These are verified response frequencies, but it is too early to determine that these are cancer MOR.

Please note that some of these are VERY CLOSE to published frequencies.

2008,2063,2103,2128,2146,2133,2162,2173,2180,2189,2208, 2263,2289,2333

These are frequencies that we have found that this woman responds to. By respond, I mean actually feels a sensation in the lesion area. This lady is very sensitive to the beam, in that she can detect various frequencies in different parts of the body.

This is how we derived the frequencies:

1. Built a program of the common ca freq.
2. Ran these for 3 minutes each, noting which ones were detected.
3. Next we scanned 2000-2400. running each freq. for 30 seconds, again
noting those with response.
4. These were compared with the "standard" freq.. in step 1.
5 Now a second scan program was used that limited the range to only those
freq.. that had a response.
6. These response freq.. were then wavered +- 20 Hz, to attempt to isolate
the exact frequency.
7. The list that we included, are the actual response(in the breast)
frequencies.
8. These were then run for 5 min. each in burst mode=.6 Hz.
So far we have had 2 consecutive sessions covering 2 days with these frequencies. We noticed that the response (feeling) had reduced on the second exposure to some frequencies. There is also a bacterial infection that has been unresponsive to antibiotic treatment. This is diminishing as we are using an antibacterial protocol along with the neoplasm frequencies.

These frequencies and time of exposure are as follows: 1865,880, 802, 787, 727, 465, 444, 125, 95, 72, 48 Time is 5 min. each This is heavy time, but we cant wait on this one.

Equipment:

Square One computer generator. Leaded glass tube 90/10 argon/neon tube wrap= copper collars spaced 1.5 inches in center wrap is CCW,CW 510XL standard mods as per Jim's book Galaxy 225 amp. running 75 watts MFJ 962C tuner VSWR 1.5 or less Tube color is pinkish-light orange

Hope this helps, if you need any additional info, drop me a line.

Bob

--------------------

I talked to a Dr. yesterday who runs a clinic down in Mexico just across the Texas border. He has been doing some research using his own anticancer formula and the R/B device. He has also been looking at the effects of the R/B device on cells using a very powerful SEM type microscope.I'll try and summarize his findings and results. 

The biggest problem he has had with either his formula or the R/B device is too large an initial die off of the tumors. He now uses a protocol where he places the patient on his formula for the first 30 days of treatment and does not use the R/B unit. There is a good reason for this which will be explaned later. At the same time he puts the patients on his formula, he also puts them on some sort of HGH ( human growth hormone ) that has none of the side effects found with the normal use of such hormones. The use of this hormone is to repair the damage done to his patients by the use of prior radiation and chemo. Nearly all of his patients are late stage 4 and in very bad shape.

Doing some testing on cell cultures with the RB device a strange phenomena happens to cells that survive the exposure. Most of the cells die from cell wall damage, but a large number do not. The cell wall heals, but the wall is what could be effectively considered as scarred. The scarred areas do not transport materials into or out of the cells. Continued exposure with the device increases the scarring till the cell eventually dies . But on death the cell is somewhat mummified and dessicated. 

This is why he puts his patients on his anticancer formula first with out use of the R/B unit. The R/B device will inhibit the uptake of the compound. So what he does is effectively saturate the patient with the material and then apply the R/B unit. What this does is seals the material into the cell. Further for what ever reason the material is activated to some degree by the R/B exposure. Sort of like Photo Dynamic Therapy, but for different reasons.

Using this protocol he is getting an 80% complete clinical remission (CCR) rate on his patients. 

He says that while using the R/B unit there is often a problem with hypo calcemia and hypo kalemia ( low potassium and calcium ) and he will put the patients on an IV drip. 

Other findings have to do with how best to use the unit. He has found that extremely long exposure times produce the best effects . He also has played with the pulse rate and is now pulsing the audio 32 times a second! 

He recently had a patient come to him that had been up in Canada to Don Tunney's volunteer sessions. The patient did respond to his visit to Canada, and had a marked scan verifiable reduction in one of his two main tumors and the other major tumor, while it did not reduce was killed according to a pathologists report.

Jim

==================

From: timothy mark harris <tharri11@scu.edu.au Subject: Parasite blow-out

Fellow Rifers,

I was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1994 at 41 yrs, after a 'second' fine-needle biopsy proved negative!! By the time I went back to the surgeon for the results, the small, rounded lump had grown 'horns'. He performed a lumpectomy but did not manage to get it all and wanted then to perform a mascectomy. I said no, and I would feel the same if he wanted to remove an arm or a leg (just a personal thing). Three weeks later I saw the visiting oncologist who said "we don't perform routine mascectomies any more!" So I did kind of feel justified in my attitude. By the time I found another surgeon who performed yet another lumpectomy and sampling of the lymph nodes in my axilla, some three and a half weeks had passed and this aggressive form was in 5 out of 10 lymph nodes sampled.

I was recommended to have six weeks radiotherapy and six treatments of chemotherapy (which I hated doing to MY body as I had been a vegetarian since 1975 and was careful about my diet). I found the oncologist an arrogant little prick, totally unwilling to answer any questions, but that's beside the point.

Having followed their regimen, I thought well, that's that. No more problems. Towards the end of 1996, I noticed when resting my arms on the windowsill (about chest high) a sore spot in my armpit. Yep. Another lump about pea size. Another barrage of tests, x-rays, whole body scans, ultra-sound. Another lumpectomy and more radiation. Previously I had radiation treatment to the entire side of my right chest, from sternum to collar-bone to edge of breast but no armpit. Can you imagine not having your armpit treated when 5 out of 10 lymph nodes were affected? Seems crazy to me now, but I THOUGHT THEY KNEW what they were doing. Once more, four weeks of radiation therapy, but by the time I received the treatment, I had two more large lumps in the armpit!!

Roughly the same time I discovered Hulga's book, and followed it as far as possible (couldn't do anything about the copper pipes living in a flat). I noticed no difference really, being on a pretty good diet and careful of chemicals anyway. The most altered was dishwashing and clotheswashing. I made my own soap (is lye healthy, though?) and found a shampoo with no 'propyl' in it as I didn't like her idea of clean hair.

It was funny, though no coincidence I guess, that James Bare had an article written up in 'Nexus' Magazine and I thought, I'll order that book. Even if I never do anything about it, I will have the blueprint for posterity that I can hand down to someone else. Little did I know that four weeks after I had received the book, I would need it. Yup! Two more lumps in the same armpit, the same barrage of tests all over again (fortunately finding nothing). So I decided I would build an RBG and everything fell into place for me. I had the two lumps removed, one under the scar tissue connecting to a lateral lymph node. I see the oncologist today (a different one from before as I've moved) and she is really delightful, even offering me ozone treatment if I thought it would do me any good the last time round. Wait till I tell her about what I've got!!

So, I've followed Don's regimen and had about eight RBG treatments, not feeling anything really or noticing any difference, but I guess that's because I've only got single or maybe slightly clumped cells floating around. However . . . and this is getting to the point of writing . . . yesterday I did the parasite frequencies of 20, 64, 72, 96, 128, 440, 524, 854, 1864, 2008, 2128, 728, 784, 880, 464 for three minutes each. Some three hours later I thought I was getting the 'flu. All my bones were aching, I was really chilled and my right armpit was aching worse than after the operation. I drunk heaps of water before retiring early but couldn't get my legs warm. My right arm, chest, boob and armpit were really paining and I couldn't get to sleep. Strange aches and pains were coming and going, even the knuckles of my left hand. This morning there is a lot of swelling, blocked lymph fluid from the hack and chop of too many surgeons I guess. This is the first real reaction I've had (apart from the sinus draining frequencies). But I can't understand why my HC zapper I built, and the herbs never did anything!!??!

Sorry, this is so long-winded but I thought I'd just pass my experiences on. My partner got treated too (probably the whole block of units), but he got no reaction whatsoever.

Which prompts me to ask a question about pacemakers and pregnancy, the two p's. Are there specific frequencies I should be careful about or just make sure 'p' people aren't present when I RBG? And, how can pregnancy be compromised (if that's the right word) with such a device if it only damages 'invaded' cells?

Regards, Dallas Ann Gould.

=====================


So do you believe that by killing the pathogen, that the diseased tissues would revert to normal? Only in this manner would one avoid a detox reaction. 

I have been filming ( video and stills) the recovery of a small( 1cm dia) skin cancer that popped up on my left arm last summer.I do not know if this is basal cell or squamous cell. Been exposing it on a regular basis now for about 3 weeks. Prior to that I would just expose it and then let it regrow some for a couple of weeks till the next exposure. Finally decided to get serious about it, so it was either knock it off with the device or have it excised. 

Here is how the area is recovering. First the frequency was found to be 2116. 2128 had little effect. At 2116 the area would start to itch and then would respond. The itching would start in about the first minute of exposure, and would continue on for some hours following exposure.Now it takes in excess of 10 minutes exposure at 2116 to get any itching out of the area. 

At first the area was was slightly indurated - that is below the surrounding surface of normal skin. A small crater if you will. The interior of the lesion was quite red and could be seen on close up viewing with my steromicroscope to be composed of some very disorganized tissue. Growth was quite haphazard and not organized.

The first series of exposures caused the area to become a bit redder and swell slightly. Then the top layer of cells of the lesion would start to shrivel and die - literally just flake off the arm in small bits. The lesion stopped agressive invasive growth and new undamaged skin could be seen to be pushing up from below the lesion. In other words it appeared the growth rate of the cancer fell behind that of the normal tissues . Thus allowing the normal tissues to fill the crater.

Continued exposure is proceeding as follows.The tissues start to become organized, and yet at first were still quite abnormal looking. Being red, and lacking good definition. 

As recovery continued, the normal folds in the skin return and the area becomes quite organized, yet it still would not appear as normal. As the skin starts to appear more normal, freckles returned, and more hair grew from the lesion site.The area continues to flake off dead skin at a faster rate than the surrounding normal area. 

At first the borders were quite even, now the borders of the lesion are quite irregular. It seems the periphery of the lesion is healing faster than the center. 

One edge of the lesion is not as recovered as the rest of the lesion. This area continues to shrink. The area is still discolored looking at it, but it is more pink now sort of like a healing wound would be. Some other spots in the lesion still show disorganized cells on close up inspection. 

Now for the good - bad part?

Using the stereo microscope which will go to about 120X, close inspection of the skin surrounding the lesion showed very small metastatic growths at the start of exposures. It was like the periphery of the lesion was seeding the area for future invasive growth. These areas could be a good Centimeter or two away from the main lesion.They were very small generally about 0.1 to 0.2 mm in size. A single exposure would generally suffice to destroy these areas. They would undergo the typical swelling and then then shrivel and flake off. 

It has been over two weeks since I noticed any of these. Last night I noticed another two of these small metastatic areas had occurred, even though the prior exposure had been just 48 hours earlier. These areas are almost microscopic - less than 0.1 mm in size I estimate. So these areas seem to be able to grow quickly , at least at the start. 

The question is of course - is this phenomena normal? Having exposed the lesion off and on over the past 9 months. Certainly nothing ever became of these micro growths. If this is not normal, is the device causing these to occur? That is, cancerous cells are dislodged and cause this? Or can such effects occur normally just because it is on my arm which is used all the time. 

Either way the main thing is that the lesion is responding to the device, but is the lesion dying in the way Rife experienced? From what we know that Rife was claiming his device would do. It appears not. 

I hope to have some of the photos, and perhaps some video capture put up on the net at a later date . Further, unless I am completely satisfied that this lesion is stable and has returned to normal, I may eventually have it excised. It does give a chance to find out why peoples cancer regrows if exposures stop. So shall see how this all progresses. 

Jim

========================

Compact Unit "U" tube, leaded glass, 25mm dia, 100% argon. Tube is 11.5" high by 5.5" wide. Separation between turns is approx 1/8". 14 gauge bare solid copper coils, 4 turns on each side of tube. Coils are wound CCW and CW. Coils are located approx 3" from electrodes. Wires to coils. 14 awg, 150C insulation, 15' long. Wires have 7 twists from tube to balun connections. Plasma is narrow and violet colored. Kinnaman, set to 250mv and gated.

Condition: Friend had severe sinus infection on right side of face. Right side of face was puffy, sensitive, and painful. Nose bleed when blowing nose. Could not hear through right ear. Area below ear was sensitive to the touch. Suffered from severe carpal tunnel in right wrist. Doctors wanted to perform surgery. Experienced constant pain from hand to shoulder. Experience pain from kidneys on both sides. Could not twist or bend over because of back pain.

Friend conducted sessions as follows:
5 minutes each freq.

Day 1 
728 experienced sensations in groin and right arm.
787 experienced sensartions in right side of face and groin.
880
1560
800 Hearing restored in right ear.
120 experienced sensations in feet and right arm.
666 experience sensations in right wrist.
690
1840
1998 experienced tingling below right ear.
776 experienced sensations in right wrist.
876
886
9999 experienced sensations in right arm, from wrist to elbow.
2008 experienced sensations in both feet and right wrist.

Day 8 Totally free from symptoms, except slight pain in right wrist.
5 minutes each freq.
465
728
787
880
1560
3672
7760
8700

Day 14 Resumed all activities with no symptoms.

5 minute each freq.
728
787
880
1560
80
120
666
690
1840
1998

No responses to any freqs. 
End of sessions.

===========================
In working with this small skin cancer on my left arm I have learned a few things that may be applicable to other people with similar problems.

1. The frequency range is critical - in my case the MOR is 2116. The site will respond to from 2114 to 2118Hz only. Anything above and below that does little to nothing.

2. It is better to be off frequency for a long duration exposure than to be on frequency for too short an exposure. Too short an exposure at or near the MOR will pump energy into the tumor and acclerate it's growth! Being close but not quite on the resononant MOR can be effective if the exposure is over 10 minutes in length. 

3. Maximum effects are seen at about 24 hours following the exposure. Some continued effects persist for up to 48 hours. Much more than 48 hours and the cancer will once again become active. By 72 hours there is some regrowth of the the cancer that can easily be seen.

4. In my case, direct light from the tube enhances effect of the device on the cancer. This may be partially due to the fact that this cancer was formed from excessive sun exposure and may actually be quite sensitive to light.

5. Pulsing the audio most definitely has enhanced effects over a continuous output when treating this cancer.


6. The cancer tends to itch and then swell some after exposure. About 12 hours following exposure, the area will start to shrink back and what I would call dessicate. Kind of puckers from lack of fluid. By 24 hours there will be noticable skin flaking off the surface of the lesion. Not unusual to see some slight bleeding at the apex of some of the larger "bumps" in the site. Area seems to cavitate and then bleed. Now this is very small on the size of 0.1 mm or less I estimate. No blood runs down my arm or anything like that. 

6. About every three weeks the cancer seems to "seed" the surrounding area with small almost microscopic cancers. These would be missed unless the nearby area was looked over with a strong magnifying glass or a dissecting microscope. These new sites generally respond readily to only one or two exposures at which time they just dry up and die. They are located about 1/2 to 3/4 inch from the primary cancer. They tend to just suddenly appear. 

7. So far no vitamin supplementation has made any difference in how the cancer has responded to the device. I have used large doses of Vitamin C - 8 to 10 grams a day, 80,000 units of Vitamin A per day, calcium, magnesium, and B vitamins . Doesn't matter to the cancer if I take the vitamins or not. Now overall I notice a difference, but to the cancer, the supplements do nothing.

On the other hand have recently ( 2 weeks ) been taking MSM at 3 grams a day, and using Arsenicum Album 30X homeopathic.All the actinic keratosis on my face are clearing up. These two items have made a big difference for the keratosis, while the device only had a marginal effect. This could be because the frequency was incorrect, or the cells are transitional. Not normal but not cancerous either. 

8. Strangely the site looks better under close observation of the microscope than it does visually. Visually one can easily see that the area is not as red, and no longer has a smooth curved border. The border is now quite jagged where areas have healed ( spent a lot of time in the sun when I was younger) .

Healing comes and goes across different areas of the cancer lesion. One week a certain area may look pretty fair and another area look pretty disorganized. The next week the areas may be reversed. Original area was about 10mm across and very circular in shape, it now is about 7mm across and somewhat irregular.

Microscopically the skin is fairly organized now with a return of the normal skin folds and coloration, some hair regrowth, and filling of what was originally a slight depression.

Jim

----------------


I received a letter today from some people that I helped to assemble their machine. They are a very ingenious people and use the R/B to its fullest test. They have massive amounts of the Maleria (all three types) and TB is rampant, and other things which go with sanitation problems. 

As to their unit is goes out quite like the ones Don produces only using a Leaded Glass streight tube. Do not know whom the manufacturer was....but I modified the 510XL just like mine and they need only 12 volts for their entire system. They use a wind generator to charge the battery system, old bicycle parts and a Delco Alternator, really well thoughtout. 

To the point of their writing me. They have recently begun the treating of Brain Fever, and initally had some losses. I reminded them of the fact that the bacterium produced by killing the Virus was as deadly as the virus itself. They have attempted several different types of regeims this appears to be the one they follow today:

1) Use the Maleria freqs 222,550,713,930,1032,1443/4/5 and the bacterium freq's 420,444,854,920/21,957,1320,1722,1832, and for the movement to the lungs 1234,3672, 9000.

A) Use of Maleria Frequencies are every other day, use of Bacterium Freq's used on opposing days. Treatment times 3Min/10sec, per freq.

Blood tests done and Ph factors used to insure Herx does not exceed limits (where they got that information from I do not know but I will ask). Duration kept short....the use of the R/B machines has made significant changes on those patients exposed. But the first losses were due to the Killoff of the Maleria....and not treating the bacterium released fast enough. So they were able to kill the Brain Fever, but by failing to move fast enough to kill the bacterium they lost patients (7).

They have posted no TB information which has simular results if you do not treat the resultant bacterium. They made some passive remarks that they had not totally considered the bacterium effect until it was too late.....eventhough I forwarded one of Jims warnings about the subject.

Cisco

-----------------------


I'm slow at things, so I just made a couple of interesting discoveries that most of you likely know already, but for someone new --:

#1 Duration: A short duration like the basic 3-minute run can actually make a problem worse. For example I used the following for arthritis in finger joints: 965-880-817-800-787 @ 3 -minutes each. Tried this several evenings and the condition was getting worse, swelling in joints, extremely painful. I quit for a week and the condition remained same - bad. So, I went back to same frequencies, ran for 10 minutes each: Big difference- swelling reduced, pain reduced , finger joints much improved.

Sometime back I had the exact same experience with a major urinary infection that I have had since 1994 which I assume is related to prostate cancer - in fact, I thought it was my cancer spreading. But, it appears to have been a secondary infection. Doctors couldn't tell what it was, antibiotics did nothing, was getting serious. When I would hit 2050 for 3 minutes it would flare up, terrible -would be in serious trouble for several weeks after this happened (3 times). Almost was hospitalized once. So, I finally went for it --set it on 2050 for ten minutes - next day -problem gone, fine since. So, experimentation is in order regarding duration and there is going to be some controversy on this issue.

#2 - Distance from tube: My Absolutely Neon bubble with 90% Arg, 10& neon 7 torr has some interesting characteristics my previous arg-neon tube didn't have: Effect does appear more pronounced (this may not necessarily have anything to do with bubble specifically). For one thing, I have my Freq Gen mounted on a platform about 2 feet out from everything else. It held perfectly steady with 'other' tube. With new tube FQ is unstable (although that tends to give that little bit of sweep we need so it works out well anyway).

And, I am of those who don't really 'feel' the Rife effect except in specific conditions so this is something I notice with the new tube that I never got before (and I had tried this with each tube): With the inflammed finger joints held up in front of me, I slowly advanced forward and backwards and at certain points (distances) I would get a sensation, sort of tingling effect. So, I must assume this is the node of the wave or the point where I am getting utlimate effect. I just found this so will experiment. I anticipate finding that each freq will be a different distance. The one above I really felt was about 6 feet away from tube.

It's obvious there is a lot to be learned! And, to think Mr. Rife had this all worked out decades ago and we have to start from the beginning!

GF 

==================

I am amazed at the rapid improvement of arthritic condition of the joints of my fingers in just a few days AFTER I INCREASED DURATION! So far, three sessions, one session per day! As I stated on an earlier post, not only was I not getting any where with arthritis frequencies but the condition was actually getting worse - being severly aggravated with each Rife session @ 3 min each freq. 

Now, I am running 10 minutes per frequency and getting amazing results. Also, as stated on previous post, I found by moving slowly forward or backward, holding my hands up, I can actually feel a tingling effect in the affected joints at specific distance from the tube - in this case about 6 to 7 feet. I suspect if I had enough room to move back I would likely find another point where I would feel it. I assume that point is optimum. The duration & distance will vary with each indiviudal set up & tube configuration.

The two I felt were: 965 & 880 . I didn't feel the others but included them.

One treatment per day: 965-880-817-800-787-728

Tube: Absolutely Neon-bubble - 90% Argon - 10% Neon -leaded glass 7 torr - mauve, full plasma glow from clamp to clamp. Clamp spread: 11 1/4 " inside to inside. amp on med: SWR 1.2:1, reflected 3.5 w 112. Kick start with striker.

In addition I try to use a reasonable diet (Also reading Eat Right but not following fully as yet). Flaxseed oil , 1 table spoon daily -going to increase to 2 per day Calcium & magnesium citrate 1 tbl daily full complement colloidal vitamin & mineral combination Enzymes: now using Solaray Super Digestaway: 175 mg pancreatin: 17,500 units protease activity 17,500 units amylase activity 1,400 units lipase activiy 25 mg Betaine HCI 40 mg Pepsin 1:10,000 50 mg Bromelain 100 mg OX Bile extract 5 mg aloe vra Gel 45 mg Pepermint leaves 40 mg Ginger root 40 mg Papaya leaves

I feel these enzymes have done a lot for me. Take one with each meal.

Well the score now is B-R vs: Fibromyalgia 0 BR 1 Groin inflammation 0 BR 1 Finger joint arthritis 0 BR 1 Meaning B-R did away with them!

If only I could find the combination for prostate cancer:

OK RCRS - Do I get at least a C+ on this one?

GF

===================

The following is Michael Prescott answering questions about using a generator at different duty cycles. He uses parellel strips of metal on either side of a slide to provide the power, not a tube.

!!IMPORTANT NOTE BEGIN!! 

See his web page to view what he means by 10% duty cycle. It is a negative square wave, so he is saying that a 10% duty cycle means it is at 0v for 10% of the cycle. For a standard 0 to +V volt square wave like people typically use on a plasma tube device, this would be a __90%__ duty cycle.

!!IMPORTANT NOTE END!!

From: eximer@netcom.com (Michael Prescott)

Yet more info, which will eventually show up on the web page once images are processed:

--- What duty cycle works best?

10% duty cycle @3225hz kills euglena sample in <5minutes 50% duty cycle @3225hz after 30 minutes barely achieves the die-off achieved @1minute using the 10% duty cycle.

This is significant, and quite unexpected. Simply dialing in frequencies at 50% duty cycle (a standard practice) won't get you anywhere! It was sheer coincidence that my original tests just happened to be performed on a 10% duty cycle (the lowest setting on the BK4011). --- What waveform works best?

Square wave, the clear winner. All dead in less than 5minutes. Sine Waves, some die-off after 30minutes Triangle Waves, some strange behavior, mor-like but little else after 30 minutes.

--- What signal offset works best? (AC signal, or DC offset) (pictures are essential here, and are forthcoming)

10% duty cycle AC kills colony in <5 minutes 10% duty cycle with full DC negative offset kills colony <5minutes 10% duty cycle with full DC positive offset kill colony in 22minutes.

50% duty cycle AC essentially the same as the 50% duty ref above: after 30 minutes barely achieves the die-off achieved @1minute using the 10% duty cycle. 50% duty at full DC offset (positive/negative create same waveform) kills colony in <5minutes.

>From this, I think we can concur with Don Tunny's subjective call that AC waveforms really *do not* produce better effects!

---

Even more significant than the above, was the discovery that MOR frequencies are not unique. The mortality effect is produced
at *ALL* harmonics of the frequencies:

3225hz My discovery. Kills colony in <5minutes
6450hz 2x the original. Kills colony in <2minutes
1612 1/2 the original. Kills colony in 5minutes
322.5khz 1000x the original. Kills colony in 5minutes
>From this, we can clearly see that the rate of kill-off is not linear, and we can probably expect that (see 6450). Knowing this, it would be possible to make a rough correllation and check for the 'correctness' and accuracy of the MOR frequency by testing the same frequency up and down its harmonics.

This also explains why the euglena MOR had an exceptionally sharp frequency tolerance: 3224..3226 anything outside of that produced interesting results, but no mass die-off.

---

To top even the last!

Retrying Hulda Clark's frequency for blepharisma which she listed as 406.5 using 130x the 3120hz that I had video taped previously gives a frequency of 405.6 (aha! another one of Hulda's famous typos).

The entire blepharisma colony was wiped out in less than 5 minutes! This means that the magic 440 divisor, stated in the archives, for Hulda's frequency, is in fact, just one in a host of harmonic divisors which achieve the same end, but just at different rates!

It also confirms that Hulda was not full of hot air, just of sloppy proof-reading. As such: Trust, but verify.

Her method of surveying these frequencies can be considered off-hand rather suspect. At this point, after seeing actual results, I think the implications are exceptionally profound. 

I think the reader should be able to see the implications of this.

--- Wrap-up:

What is the best of the best to produce MOR reactions as indicated from the data so far?

Square-waves with 10%duty cycle An AC signal works just as well as a Negative Offset DC

[ looking forward to hear from others for confirmation in ] [ their own experiments ]

The Web page (4 total now) has been updated with latest info and results on B-field results, Duty Cycle, Waveform and Amplitude comparisons.

http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/4995/

regarding previous results with Harmonic, or rather more correctly multiples of the fundamental frequency, yes, I did all these tests using the function generator driving the microscope. 

I really do believe that there is only one factor by which the Dan Device Rife/Bare and Clark device work. The fact that the same frequency affected the specimen sample using all three methods is highly suggestive.

Don't think it's light, because contemporary as well as historical records show that sealed boxes were not a barrier. Really, there is no data or facts to support this.

Don't think it's a B-field (per se) because the Clark device as well as my experiment with the electrified slide would produce minimal B-field due to high impedance of the sample (>1meg-ohm).

The only thing I see as common to all three is the E-field which either arises from the dB/dT factor in the Dan device, directly in the Clark device, or as a component of the RF field in the Rife/Bare device (which is what was perhaps being registered by the Hall effect sensor in the archive messages regarding 'Anomalous Magnetic Fields' or very large B-fields arising from the Rife field).

The latest results strongly suggest that the amplitude, wave shape, duty cycle, and DC/AC offset play significant roles (at least in the case of the test-slide).

I intend to test these prediction results out in the actual Rife field at a later time.

========================


Adenosarcoma of the breast in cat being treated as reported by Fred Walter on his web page. Example:


Monday, July 7, 1997

--------------------

There were two people and one cat present during the session. The two people were healthy.

The cat has cancer - adenosarcoma of the breast. It was first diagnosed with this cancer in November 1996. The owner was using herbal means to combat the cancer, with tumor shinkage, until the Health Protection branch of the Canadian goverment made one of the substances that he was using require a prescription. Eventually he managed to get a prescription for the substance but during the time that he wasn't able to use it, the tumor grew to 3/4" thick, 2 5/8" long, 7/8" tall in size. At this point the herbal treatments were no longer able to shrink the tumor, they were just able to stop the tumor from growing any larger. The tumor size has been stable for the 3 months prior to June 24, 1997.

Since the cat's June 24, 1997 session, the following has occurred:
- the tumor has shrunk from 3/4" thick, 2 5/8" long, 7/8" tall in size
to 1/4" thick, 2" long, 3/8" tall in size
and the surface of the tumor now feels nodular and bumpy
- most of this shrinkage occurred in the first week and a half
- the tumor is floating in a sac of inflamation fluids under the fur and
the owner can no longer feel any connections between the tumor and the
muscle wall
- the cat has a *lot* more energy, is friskier, playful and is climbing
on things again
- the cat smells a lot better (during the first session there was a really
strong bad smell coming from the cat - this odor has decreased to the
point that it is almost not noticable)
- the day after each Bare-Rife device session to date, inflamation has
occurred around the tumor site, and the cat has had diarrhea for a day
or two, and the tumor has gotten smaller
- the cat's owner is giving the cat 6 capsules/day of Nature's Way
Milk Thistle to help it detoxify 

For a summary the cat's herbal program, a summary of the equipment used and a diagram showing the layout of my equipment see: http://www.u36.com/~fredw/evaluation/19970624.txt

Here is a summary of the session (SWRs/durations are approximate):

Frequency SWR Duration
(Hz) 
--------- ------------- -----------------
2182 1.27 3-4 minutes
2180 1.25 4-5 minutes
2128 1.22 4-5 minutes
2050 1.22 3-4 minutes
2008 1.2 3-4 minutes
8-10 minutes break
880 1.7 4-5 minutes
800 1.6 3-4 minutes
784 1.6 3-4 minutes
728 1.55 3-4 minutes
664 1.55 3-4 minutes
304 2.0 4-5 minutes
10-12 minutes break
2182 1.27 3-4 minutes
2128 1.25 3-4 minutes
2050 1.2 3-4 minutes
2008 1.2 3-4 minutes

The "Duration" times will have been longer than stated because:
- the time taken to (switch frequencies and to try to find the best SWR at the new frequency) was not measured
- sometimes the timer was not reset right after a frequency change

The frequencies were chosen for the following reasons:
- 2182, 2180, 2128, 2050, 2008 - in the range that is supposed to help stimulate white blood cell activity, and supposed to help with cancer
- other frequencies - picked from the two lists that I possess

The cat sits on its owners lap, and is around 12' from the tube.

I run my system with the cover on the MFJ-949E and on the MFJ-912 because I seem to get lower SWRs with the covers on.

The breaks were to let the equipment cool off.

Even with the breaks, the large wire coil in the antenna tuner and the external balun get really *HOT*.

During the breaks I took the covers off of the MFJ-949E and the MFJ-912 to let them cool off. I did *not* put a fan on either of them until after the session was over.

I didn't feel much during the session. Nor did the other person.

The cat did not want to get out of its cat carrier when it was time to start the session. It really had a *lot* of energy. At one point during the session it tried to get away from its owner, and it almost made back into the carrier. It has done this several sessions in a row.

During the first bunch of frequencies in the range 2008Hz-2182Hz, the cat was breathing more rapidly than usual. During the other frequencies the cat was calm, and after the 304Hz frequency, it looked like it was about to go to sleep. The second time that we ran 2182Hz, 2128Hz and 2008Hz, the cat's breathing sped up again.

The cat shed very little hair.

==========================

In one of the detail sheets that came with an expensive pad device, there was a frequency list and some anecdotes. One anecdote was by a healer who had a very good record using the device. When asked what the secret of her success was, she said she always ran the parasite frequencies for serious disease, then the ones listed for the disease itself. The literature also warned against using frequencies between 1000-2000Hz since these might actually stimulate growth of malignant tissue, yet one of the parasite frequencies was within that range.

==========================

I had a client with multiple moles who was told by a homeopath the moles could be the result of inherited syphilis. I used a syphilis frequency and her moles began to itch. The same phenomenon happened with a cancer frequency. It is common knowledge that moles can become malignant. When I used the syphilis freqs (650, 625, 600) not only did her moles react but I had a pain behind my left eye (syphilis can cause eye damage) for 10 sec and then my jaw realigned with a loud snap. Try these settings if you have jaw or eye problems which are unresponsive to other freqs. 

========================

I have one thing of interest that I thought shouldn't wait until I find the time to post updated session reports.

The cat's tumor shrunk after the first 3 sessions to around 1/3rd its original size. Then it seemed to seemed to stay relatively the same in size (some shrinkage, but not much) after the next couple of sessions. So we took a look at Don Tunney's latest (from May) update to his web-site, and noticed that some people were adding in a bunch more frequencies in the 2000-2200 range. So we added 2190 2170 2160 2150 2140 2094 to the list of frequencies that we were using.

The cat's owner phoned me tonight to tell me that the new frequencies seem to have started the tumor shrinking again, along with a few more changes in texture/consistency. I'll get the details from him when he shows up for the cat's next session.

So, if your cancer and/or your pet's cancer is unresponsive to the frequencies that you are using, you could see what happens if you add a few more of the frequencies that other people have reported using.

So far we are using (3 or more minutes each) of: 2190 2182 2180 2170 2160 2150 2140 2128 2094 2050 2008 for cancer, and (3 or more minutes each) of: 880 800 784 728 664 464 304 because other people seem to be using these frequencies.

You may want to cut back on frequencies and/or duration if you are just starting out. Killing off too much cancer too fast is probably, at the least, very unpleasant to experience.

fred

=================================


Status Report #3, 6/10/98

Introduction and Goal

Continued research of the Rife/Bare Plasma Emission Frequency Technology (PEFT) based on the basic unit per Dr Jim Bares instructions. Some variations are employed and confirmation of their use is based entirely upon volunteer responses. The responses should be equal or better as defined by the symptomatic and diagnostic reports.

These results are not meant to confute other researchers results. It is the sole purpose to report experimental results based entirely upon volunteer responses with supporting confirmations from their interactions with their personal Oncologists or physicians.

Based on these results, the effectiveness of the basic unit has been confirmed! Modifications have been prolific on the list, but no confirmation based on actual volunteer responses have been established. I am not suggesting that all modification be suspended, but simply offering these results as a suggested operational procedure for establishing meaningful and effective changes.

In order to establish the device from a scientific basis, sound research in principle must be conducted. This does mot mean the traditional blind studies, but results based on actual volunteers responses.

Equipment: All tubes are straight or "U" type. Tube connections were 14 guage bare copper coils, 4 turns each. Balun: MFJ 912 or Amidon torroid kit, 18 turns. Tuner: MFJ 949E or 948 Palomar 225 (blue face) Uniden Pro 510 XL Kinnaman frequency generator. Samlex switching power supply 1223

Tubes: Pyrex tube with 100% Argon. Color is white and gets very hot. Although effective, not prefered, because of heat generation.

Standard leaded glass tube with 100% argon, 6 torr, runs relatively cool. Tube can be grasped even after hours operation. Plasma color mauve. Plasma can be narrow or fill the tube. No significant differences were observed in volunteer symptomatic responses.

Power: Minimum power was 30 watts. Maximum power was 70 watts.

Frequency generator: Kinnaman frequency generator (FG) is used because of ease of use and programmining capability which makes opration of multiple frequencies simple to excute. FG must be set for gated mode and deviation may be set for 3 or 4.

FG mv output: FG mv output can be set for 185 mv or 250 mv. No significant differences were observed based on volunteer symptomatic responses.

SWR: SWRs, SWRs may vary from 1.0 to 2.0. No significant differences were observed based on volunteer symptomatic responses.

Distance from tube ranged from 4 ft. to 10 feet. No significant differences were observed based on volunteer symptomatic responses.

Power output of 30 watts was effective in Gliobastoma based on volunteer's (8 ft distance) symptomatic responses. Power output of 70 watts was also effective based on volunteer's symptomatic responses. No significant differences in power level usage were observed based on volunteer's symptomatic responses.


Frequencies Used: Basic frequencies were 2008 and 2128. Initial session time was 10 minutes each. Gating was employed. Deviation was employed. Sessions were conducted daily or every other day.

No significant differences noted by volunteers positive symptomatic responses. Herxheimer responses were minimal, except for one volunteer, who had impaired lymph and circulatory problems..

Positive results were observed for Gliobastoma carcinoma, multiple myeloma, bacterial, fungal, yeast infections, and parasitic complications. 

Impact on tumors were immediate and reduction of symptoms was dramatic and progressive.

Associative contributors, fungus, yeast, bacteria, viruses were addressed early in program and continued on a maintenance schedule. Minimum exposure was 5 minutes each. 

Herxheimer reactions were tracked and appropiate action was taken to relieve symptoms. Only associative contributors freqs were reduced or suspended to relieve Herxheimer reactions. 

Impaired kidney, liver, and lymph functions were considered in initial and continued sessions.

All volunteers experienced positive responses based on symptomatic changes and doctors reports.

Volunteers using herbs and minerals experienced positive synergistic responses.

A volunteer with Multiple myeloma (MM), acute osteoporosis, multiple spinal compression fractures, acute anemia, 70% of bone marrow involved, severe physical impairment, severe posture complications, responded positively. Dramatic changes were observed in as little as 15 days. Progress based on blood work was conducted by personal physician.

Volunteer experienced reversal and significant reduction of all MM symptoms. After 3 months, Volunteer has resumed all previous duties and activities. Caution is exercised to avoid falls which can result in bone fractures. All posture abnormalities appear to be resolved. Oncologist has removed volunteer from all medication. Oncologist prognosis: complete recovery expected in 6 months. Continued sessions with physician monitoring in progress.

Gliobastoma volunteer now back to work with no tumor detection by MRI or symptoms.

Sessions and monitoring are recommended and continuing.

No regressions have occured.

These results are typical.

Paul

=========================


A while back, I reported on someone who was exposed to the beam who felt 2128 strongly in the abdomen. It was continued for 10 minutes. This person has undergone conventional cancer treatment twice in the last three years. Supplements he was doing at the time included MSM, cal-mag citrate, and Euroalt tea (merely eating a 1/2t powder per day).

A day later, a bunch of what looked like black threads, many attached to what looked like pea-sized balls of flesh, were expelled. Most sank, but some were floating. They were expelled over two days. Samples were placed in rum in a glass jar. They were brought to a hospital lab 5 days later.

They reported "It's something, but we don't know _what_ it is. It is pickled and impossible to identify." To me, the sample did not look that different 5 days later as it did the day after it was expelled. The doctor said that next time it happened to immediately bring the sample to the lab, day or night. Hopefully it won't happen again since I bet they could not have identified it if it was fresh. I did. It is a parasite that does not exist in this country, according to conventional parasitology. Intestinal fluke. Clark's cancer-causing parasite. 


The picture was right out of Hulda's book Cure for all Cancers. They were intestinal flukes, balled up, surrounded by black egg sacs, which look like black legs, and lots of "legs" floating around. I thought the egg sacs were the worms and did not know what the balls they were attached to were. They were not pickled. They were balled up after being destroyed by the generator. The "flesh" being balled up threw me, and I did not recognize it as a fluke. But Hulda's book shows them in various states of decay, and they matched. These were already decayed from the effect of the beam. I thought at first it may have been threadworms attached to bits of possibly cancerous tissue, but I know typically threadworms are not black and cancer does not make distinct pea-sized balls of flesh in the intestines.

These were expelled mainly as a result of using 2128Hz, but I dialed in a few cancer freqs for 5 minutes each, including 2008, 2000, and 2084 (I had a misprint in the list I was following, this should have been 2184 instead - fortuitous?) I thought cancer frequencies removed tumors directly, which caused the herx. I now think that perhaps they are merely intestinal fluke frequencies.

If this is the case, I was wrong in my statements of the last couple of days. I should have listened to Bare, who said the beam does not kill cancer cells directly. And Clark, who said remove the intestinal flukes and the cancer will be taken care of in short order. Or the poster from Tuesday who said that cancerous cells' DNA are not significantly different from human and therefore not affected by the beam directly.

Thing that bothers my about this is that the person had been exposed to the beam a number of times before and no worms were expelled (that were noticed) - but had never been exposed to this frequency for 10 minutes straight. Plus, no one on the list has reported expelling these critters. Those with active cancer may have intestinal flukes primarily in the liver (as Clark says) in which case they may be destroyed by digestive juices before they are ejected from the body, but it still seems they would also be in the intestines, expelled whole, and noticed by more people.

turf

=================================

Mike Graham wrote: >

I am looking for some suggestions. An elderly gentleman has been using the machine I built to treat himself for Prostate Cancer. I have followed the directions from the book written by James Bare exactly, and so far there is no improvement in his PSA count. He started using the machine last summer, faithfully did the cancer frequencies twice each week. His PSA started at 6.5 last summer, and today it is still the same. When he 1st started using the machine, his PSA jumped up to 8.7 however he had the test the next day after using the machine. A couple of weeks later it was back to 6.5. 

I had my machine over to the conference, and all seemed to be in order. I have either built it incorrectly although I have lots of power, over 150 watts, with low SWR's, I can hear the frequencies changing, and the tube easily lights, so I do not think this is the problem. The machine I built has an internal balun with a fan over the top of it, would an external balun help? What about pulsing the machine, instead of running the frequency steady. I am looking for any suggestions, as at this point it appears the machine doesn't work for prostate cancer. 

The frequencies we ran are as follows - 880 x 3 min, 800x3 min, 728x3min, 5000x3 min, 9999x3 min, 3176x3 min, 2192x6 min, 2184x6 min,2176x6 min, 2134x6 min, 2128x10 min, 2120x6 min,494x3min, 304x3 min. 

Thank-you for any help. Mike Graham

Mike,

It has been suggested by one other person on this list that frequencies run at 3 minutes does not provide a long enough exposure to the plasma (I believe it was Gerald Foye, but I wouldn't bet on it).

I noticed you only ran one frequency at 10 minutes (2128) and that is supposed to be a "cancer" frequency. If it were me, I would increase the per-frequency times up to about 10 minutes for all of them, just to attempt to gauge any effects. I would do so very gingerly (carefully) to make sure that a severe Herx does not occur.

Just a suggestion--it may or may not work--but, I think, is worth a try. Does anyone else on the list have any suggestions?

All the best, Tom Miller milcomark@topcatt.com

---

>> it appears the machine doesn't work for prostate cancer

*.NOT SO--ADJUSTMENTS NEEDED!*

>> >> The frequencies we ran are as follows - 880 x 3 min, 800x3 min, >> 728x3min, 5000x3 min, 9999x3 min, 3176x3 min, 2192x6 min, 2184x6 min,2176x6 >> min, 2134x6 min, 2128x10 min, 2120x6 min,494x3min, 304x3 min. >>

I have some freq you do not have. These are the freq that Don gave me that he runs. the ones that you are missing are: * 2008, 2720, 2292,,2112,* According to my notes on Rife's original freq for *prostate* I have* 2720, 2128,2008, 728, 664, and 408*-. I too would run these for 10 mins each. I run them for however long the person feels it if they are sensitive to the tube. Usually all people here cease to feel it in 10-12 mins. Which corresponds with the time an immune response can be mounted by the body.

Also people on this list are always talking about deparasitizing which I could not do because of the herbs involved and my sensitivities. So I finally ran 64Hz through 128hz by 8's and had a tremendous herx reaction. After I was over the reaction I ran the freq again and had no reaction. I erroneously did each for 10 mins each. I also scanned the whole range by .1hz--took forever. Cured my ringworm tho. I did a lot better all around after this. 

Perhaps the added cleansing needs to be done for this person's immune system to be strengthened. Also, keeping a PSA stable is not failure!!!!!!!!

Also 664 is for emotional ties to disease and I run it with the rest and 464 is Candida which I run also with the group--according to how it affects me. During this last siege I ran the 464 and felt it everywhere, which I knew because I have candida and have had high sweats trying to overcome nausea. So I am detoxing now from this and that was just one time.

I also do this. After running these freq for a period of time. Like several months, I realized that I wasn't feeling them so much, but another person not so well exposed was. So. I thought either I have contained these and no longer need them or I have some mutation. So I experimented with the scanning. I went either side of each freq by 1/10hz to 8hz above and below. So I went 2008+8 by 1/10thhz and 2008-8 by 1/10hz. On some of them I felt it--I am sensitive to the freq, some aren't.

I always "felt" it where I knew I had some damage in the past or from my own physiology, where something proabably was brewing now (Know yourself and how you react to food , lite, water, air amd so forth) I have found that some people have no idea what is going on with them until they have a crisis. The body gives us many clues before that time.

'Well, once again a book. God Speed in your humanitarian efforts! The Good Samaritan--remember? and remember "Don't give up five minutes before the MIRACLE!!!!!!"

----

Good suggestions from Tom and Susan. Besides the other frequencies they mention, Bare's frequency lists state that 2180/2182 can be used for cancer that does not respond to 2008 or 2128. I would give special attention to any frequencies that Tunney provides for this condition since he has more experience than most. Also to note are Bare's suggestions that for places like the prostate or bowel, it may be necessary to increase the power (use a higher wattage amp), especially if the user is over 200 pounds. It would be interesting to see if this problem could be circumvented by using the tube vertically.

From what I understand, the PSA goes up when cancer cells die so it appears that the BRG initially had some success (nibbled at the edges), but did not penetrate enough to cure. At least it seems to have stabilized it, though.

And let me again reiterate that any prostate program that has a chance of long term success MUST include metal avoidance and preferably cleansing and usually mineral deposit removal, too.

====================================================


G'day ...... well our little boy cat died about a fortnight ago and I have been too upset to write it up ......he had 4th stage Adeno-Carcinoma of the colon and rectal area and had lost his voice so can only assume it was in the throat as well ...... he had 3 teeth out and the vet did not say there was anything there (but they only want your money ... don't care about the pets)so we also had an animal naturopath named Margaret who gave us some mixtures (haven't written that up yet)which worked real good on Leroy and he was goinG great .......before I had a Rife unit he was given Colloidal Silver in his drinking water .......ok rambling a bit ....... he had 15 exposures to Rife in 3 weeks before he passed he got his voice back and stopped chucking his food up and seemed to be ok except for weight loss then over a 2 day period he got so weak would not eat or drink and went to sleep and did not wake up ........I am told he probably had the C in other organs and they shut down ........

and I'm still bloody well upset that it was all working but was not successful....

BUT THE UNIT WORKED AND WE HAD HIM FOR 3 MONTHS MORE THAN THE VET SAID... AND HE DID NOT APPEAR TO BE IN PAIN FROM HIS GENERAL ALMOST NORMAL RUNNING AROUND .... 

Brian in OZ 

--

Thanks for the report. Your experience with your cat is fairly typical. Animals, and people for that matter, that are within a few weeks of death from Cancer often only show a temporary return of their vitality, a relief of pain, and then die anyway. Reason? When the total amount of cancer in the body reaches a point that it threatens life, then many other organ and general metabolic systems are stressed and may be failing as an indirect consequence of the demands put upon them by other organs than have cancer.

Further, it may be one thing to destroy the cancer, but it is another problem all together for an organ damaged by the cancer to once again become functional. So you may destroy the cancer but the person or animal continues on a downward slide that ends in death. An analogy can be found in people that have heart attacks. They may survive the attack, but the damage to the heart is still there. The loss of efficiency of the heart then leads to problems with the lungs and kidneys, which then leads to many other problems and the person can then die of what is known as congestive heart failure.

Still, what happened is a tragedy. The prolongation of life, and the quality of life your cat experienced after exposures started, I am sure had great meaning to your cat as well as yourself. It certainly beats watching an animal or human die in great pain and an invalid from the ravages of cancer on their bodies.

Jim

------

I would have to agree with you. I was working with an elderly gentleman (78) that was also near death when he started using the machine. He had pancreatic cancer, and it was also in his liver. At 1st he seemed to pick up really well. He had very little pain and sometimes didn't have any. Unfortunately he was weak, and then one night he fell in the bathroom at 5am. 10 days later, he died. The day before he died, was the 1st day he used morphine. He threw up about a cup of blood that day, and then the following day he again vomited blood twice. I don't know if he hurt himself from the fall, or if the cancer did something to him. 

His experience was almost like the cat, little pain, seemed to pick up, but unfortunately he didn't make it.

==============================

Following ongoing reports (over a period of weeks so far, multiple reports divided by ---) from someone with a large tumor on the neck. Hodgkin's, verified with a biopsy which seemingly caused it to explode in growth as well as become infected and not reheal, so conventional treatment could not be performed (it encases vessels and nerves to the head). He recently started using a R/B after years of fighting it with other methods. He thinks he is also infected with tapeworms, and there is possibly a single huge one in the tumor. He has tried conventional treatment for tapeworms, too (cost him $2000) and it seemed to work for a while, but did not treat encsysted ones and pretty soon, they were back full swing. Even so, he has not yet tried the focusing technique (using a pie plate or wok to focus the wave) since he is afraid it will kill him - when the wave is too powerful, the tumor strangles him, although he can go long durations when a sufficient distance from the tube.

Note that he can go very long times without detox reactions since even though he has a large tumor (smaller tumors around body too) he keeps his organs clean. He takes large amounts of magnesium, drinks veg and wheat grass and brocolli sprout juices, takes Stone Free and ginger, eats fennel seeds and pineapple. As mentioned below, he thinks pineapple has the most effect on assisting drainage.

I did not recommend he do these very long duration treatments, and mentioned that it may be better to give himself a break at least every other day, but he does not think he can wait this long between treatments.

---------------

I get massive reactions to tapeworm frequencies, which is consistent with my experience with Hulda Clark's frequencies. There sure seems to be a large adult inside the tumor. I assaulted him for 3 hours, and got all kinds of drainage. He was still complaining when I quit, so I don't know how much more it will take. Obviously, I will never get rid of the (large) tumor without getting rid of him. I never could kill him with Hulda Clark's methods.

It seems to me that eliminating him and his smaller cousins has to be one of, if not my highest priorities.

----

My tumor is now reacting the most to:

* Pseudomonus frequencies * Candida frequencies * Carcinoma cancer frequencies.

I get reactions, not just at the tumor, to various parasite frequencies.

----

[After using the device for two weeks, there was not a noticeable decrease in total mass, so ways to make the device more powerful were explored. This R/B is made with a black-faced palomar, seems to have incredible harmonics, loud tone from CB, and beam stays coherent even at low frequencies. Minimum power is over 140W. Tube is 28" 80/20 10mm pressure bubble tube from Allred, for even more effect.]

> Have you done the pie plate thing yet, or did you > just ground yourself to the device? Try going > 30" from the tube, or did this cause a headache? 

I am using a copper pipe, but with no wet paper over it. I get no headaches with close range, but if it is too effective, I can't sustain the treatment for long because of the swelling.

Mostly I am lying on the pipe, with the pipe under a shoulder or thigh, depending on where I want to concentrate the treatment. I typically sleep during treatments of up to several hours in duration.

I seem to do much better when I eat raw pineapple. Otherwise, the tumor doesn't drain well, and gets bigger rather than smaller when I assault the tapeworms. My guess is the drainage becomes infected with fungus.

I am having the best success with the Echinococcinum frequency of 542 times 9, or 4878. I vary the frequency up and down 10 hertz, and I get massive drainage (with pineapple). 

>One suggestion - always do the cancer freq(s) you >like most after doing tapeworm frequencies. Only >needs to be for 5 min or so if there's not time. >Use the 2128 -/+ 8.

Yes, I spend typically a couple of hours on these frequences a day.

I am taking some (Shaklee) calcium.

[Is the machine worth it since you haven't experienced a noticeable regression after almost three weeks?]

The machine is doing powerful things. I just have a very tricky problem. Destroying the contents of the big tumor without strangling myself is a constant challenge. Keeping the tapeworms from growing back is a constant challenge as well. But these are not problems with the Rife machine.

=============================

Following are frequencies to try on tumors to attempt to remove potential growth factor producing organisms based on Clark's recent research on tumor shrinking (on her web page).

In this, she seems to imply that she was wrong in the past and that fungus, bacteria, tapeworms, or other parasites can provide enough growth factors to fuel tumors, not just intestinal flukes. This is something I suspected before she posted her research.


Here are the Rife frequencies for the three types of fungus she says she finds most often in tumors. Freqs for all types of that fungus are included. For specific types, see the lists. Freqs in no particular order:

Penicillium 344, 2411, 321, 555, 942, 332, 766

Aspergillis 1823, 524, 374, 743

Rhizopus 132



Here're some tapeworm freqs from the Rife lists:

Tapeworm (general) 522,562,843,1223,3032,5522

Echinococcinum 164, 453, 542, 623


Clark states that the most common tapeworms to provide growth factors for tumors are Moniezia, Dipylidium and Diphyllobothrium. There are not separate entries in the Rife lists for them, but Clark has them in her book "Cure for all Diseases." Of course, these freqs cannot be used directly on a BRG. I am now experimenting with dividing her freqs by 100 to see if there is any effect. Here are the freqs divided by 100:

Moniezia 4652 Diphyllobothrium 4876, 4723 Dipylidium 4443, 4722

To use a divisor of 99 instead of 100, multiply above values by 1.01. To try one of 440, multiply by 100 and divide by 440.

Try multiplication factors on Rife numbers stated above (x3 or x9, e.g.) if desired. 

-----

Don't forget to occasionally run other parasites sets:

Short Parasite Set 20, 64, 72, 96, 120, 128, 440, 524, 800, 854, 1864.

Full Parasite Set 20, 64, 72, 96, 102, 120, 128, 423, 440, 524, 562, 650, 732, 800, 843, 854, 1223, 1864, 2322, 3032, 4412, 5000, 5522.

Always use 728, 784, 880, 464 with parasite sets.

Here're the Garvey frequencies used to treat flukes in cancer treatment (which he says they find in 90% of cancer cases): 143, 275, 676, 763, 524, 854, 945, 651, 435, 15244 Hz. I also think that cancer frequencies like 2128, 2000, 2008, and 2084 may help remove intestinal flukes.

------

Here are the "regular" cancer frequencies:

Also see lists for specific recommendations to use in addition to these based on type. See electroherbalism regimen for protocol on using these and on using parasite frequency set after initial detox from these.

2128, 2008, 2184, 2050, 2720, 6064, 6384, 120, 800, 728, 784, 880 666, 464, 5000, 3176, 10000, 304

====================================

The following results are provided as information regarding the operation of a basic Bare unit, except where deviations are noted. These variations are not intended to encourage deviation from Bare's basic recommendations. It is apparent that many variables exist with all the units in the field and various successes have been achieved with them. Unless other wise stgated, all components are as stated in Bare's "Manual". All setups are intended to make the unit as portable as possible.

I have decided to make full modification to the Uniden Pro 510 XL per Jim Bares "Manual", which consist of cutting D-14 diode, R-93 resistor, removal of solder bridge, removal of small capacitor near the word "RED", replacement of 0.47 capacitor with 0.68 uf 50 volt electrolytic, replacement of L8 with a 220 ohm resistor, installation of 2SC1969 transistor, installation of a heat sink, finnally, adjustment of L6 inductor coil. 

Results from volunteers will be monitored to determine any signficant changes with the extensive Uniden modifications.

Power output had varied from 30 to 70 watts. Power level has been raised to 50 to 100 watts.

SWRs will continue to range from 1.0 to 2.0.

Tube shapes are standard leaded glass, 22" long, straight or U with 100% argon. 

Lighting of the tubes is easy without any problems. These tubes were made by Robt Randazzo.

A Phanotron and an Allred bubble tube are now under study. The Phanotron is filled with Bill Cheb's Helium gas mixture. The Bubble tube is what Barry uses.

The Phanotron tube and the bubble tube are easy to light. For the bubble tube, I only use wire cloth, 1/4 inch opening, 3.5 inches long on the ends of the bubble tube and it works just fine. 14 guage stranded wire is connected to the wire cloth with aligator clips. wire lugs are used for connection to Balun or tuner.

Some tube connections are 14 gauge solid bare copper coils with 4 turns each. Coils are wound CCW and CW. Coils are placed approximately. 4" from the tips of tube. 12 or 10 gauge wire can be used, but they are more difficult to wind or shape. 

Connection to coils is by 14 gauge stranded wire, 9 to 12 inches long and are to the outside ends of the coils. Wire lugs are soldered to the ends that connect to the Balun or Tuner.

The Balun used is the Amidon Torrid Balun Kit or MFJ 912. The Torroid Balun Kit core can be wound with 11, 18, or 22 bifial turns. There doesn't seem to be much difference.

Tuners used are MFJ 949E, 948, and 971.

Coax RG58/U connections, CB (3" to 6") to Palomar and Palomar (9" to 12") to Tuner are kept as short as possible.

Palomar, Blue faced and Black faced, work equally as well with no overheating problems, provided adequate cooling is provided. Fan on top and on bottom may be used. I drill eight 1/2 inch holes on each side of the palomar. 

Power to Kinnaman is provided from CB through pin #4. The 110 vac transformer is not used. 

Kinnaman provides smooth uninterrupted operation for the whole exposure session with minimal inputs. Gated mode is used for all sessions. A deviation of 4 is used for all frequencies.

All Kinnaman F1A, F1B, F1C have a gated mode and all models are effective.

The latest Version, F1C, allows one to eliminate the 12-second pause between programmed frequencies.

I normally set the Pulse rate for the Kinnaman for 4 CPS. Experiments in the variation of the pulse rate, 3 second duration to 50 cps, is under way.

Paul

=======================


Finding Cancer Frequencies

Two of the anecdotes in the Bare-Rife Reports file on my web page are from James Bare. They deal with a small skin cancer that "popped up" on his arm. This is someone who has probably been exposed to the beam more than anyone so it is surprising that a cancer would develop in the first place. He details how the cancer reacts to the device when he finds the correct frequency, which happens to be 2116. 2128 does not affect it. Anything above 2118 or below 2114 (except the harmonics) has little if no effect. It should illustrate how important it is to find the correct frequency or frequencies to treat a cancer.

I suspect that there is little effect of the person's individual makeup (DNA) on the response to a frequency. We must just find the correct frequency for that type of cancer at that location. Cancers takes on characteristics of the tissues they invade and probably require certain frequencies based on the location and type. For example, there are different frequencies in the lists for breast, lung, and colon carcinomas. When available, these should be tried along with the basic cancer set of 2048/2050/2052, 2008, 2127/2128, 2180/2182/2184, and perhaps 2084. 

One big problem is that the cancer frequencies are not just in the 2000-2200 range, but that is a good starting point for scanning. Other frequencies that are hits (cause sensation) can be found by the method of using a frequency set until there is no longer much detox reaction to it, then using a different frequency set (still including all the cancer freqs) for a while. I detailed this a few weeks ago in a post.

There is no guarantee that a hit at the site will be an actual cancer frequency. It may be merely a pathogen that took up residence due to the depressed immune system in the area and not typical of the type and location of the cancer. And of course, there are many times that a hit will not be felt even if it is doing the job since it depends on whether there are nerves or muscles in the area which can transmit the sensation if a sensation could indeed be felt for that pathogen.

A method I think is good for scanning 2000-2200 for cancer frequencies was also detailed in the post, and that was to use a Kinnaman, deviation 2, and scan 2000, 2008, 2116, 2124, ... 2232 on one session and the next try 2004, 2012, 2020, 2028, ... 2228. The deviation of 2 means it varies 2Hz up and down from the chosen frequency. This would cover all the frequencies in the range.

When people are interacting, subtle sensations at the site may be missed. During important scans it may be best to sit quietly in a dim room. What I think may be the best way, but quite difficult to implement in most cases, is to scan while the subject is asleep. Hits are noted when the subject acts uncomfortable, rolls over suddenly, gets tense (watch the fingers), scratches, twitches, etc. Of course, some are normal reactions in the course of sleep, but real hits will quickly become apparent. 


===================

Last Thursday morning, 11-15-98, while moving some items around, I began to experience a pain in the area of a rib low in my back. I thought at first that I'd 'dislocated' or otherwise done some physical damage to it, but couldn't recall having done anything specific or felt a specific onset of the pain. The increasing pain wasn't close to the spine, but grew worse as the day progressed, motivating me to finally get horizontal for a couple of hours late in the afternoon to let the body rest.

Friday morning, rib in left lower back still painful.... got to thinking & remembering a situation from over 12 years ago, when a similar pain had started in the same location... It had gotten worse, & spread around that rib to the front, getting bad enough where having clothing touch the area was very aggravating... Finally, a line of small red spots / blisters had appeared, and was my first experience with "Shingles", the Herpes Zoster virus, commonly associated with Chicken Pox in kids - had it when I was young, as many did...

Hulda Clark lists the resonant frequency of Herpes Zoster as being detected at from 416.6KHz to 420.2KHz, and recommends using 418KHz. This is why I built the Zapper HFA series devices- so I could set it for any specific frequency, including all of Hulda Clark's.

I set the Adjustable Frequency Zapper to 418 KHz, and hooked up a 3" square stainless steel contact pad, plugged into the positively charged 'high current' output jack on the HFA, placing the pad directly against the skin in the painful area on my lower back. The Main handpiece/ housing, which is the negatively charged hand piece when Zapping, was placed against the skin at my lower right front ribs - directly opposite through the body. A back brace belt was used to hold these in place while I ran about doing other things. 

With a 9 cell Nicad battery, running at about 11.8 volts, and no attenuation on the output current level, I kept the device on for around 20 minutes. About that time, I was noticing a slight annoying 'biting bug' sensation in the area of the hand piece / housing against the skin on my right front lower rib area. I moved it a bit, but felt the sensation again, but also was noticing that, while there was no discomfort at the site of the 3" square pad on my back, the pain that had been there since the previous day was almost completely gone!

Was it a flair up of Shingles? I strongly believe so. Is it gone now? Yes, with one ~20-25 minute session with the Zapper HFA, set at 418 KHz. No further pain at all... none. If you've ever experienced how painful shingles can become, you'll know how happy I was to have knocked it out so quickly and thoroughly! I'm not sure how a longer standing shingles flair up will respond; didn't intend to let this episode go on any longer if I could help it!

Side effects: the Zapper HFA housing against my skin over the front right side, had too little contact area for the amount of current I was running; I should have used a second 3" square pad plugged into the black, grounded jack on the device. (ever find yourself in a bit too much of a hurry, too many things to try to get done? <grin> ) The 'insect bite sensation was in fact a very small area of skin that was evidently much more conductive; a small 'electrical burn' was the result. You can do three things to prevent this from happening to you:

1> Use larger contact pads when using higher voltage / current output devices. (I had <1/4 of the skin contact area that I would have had, if I had been using another of the 3" square stainless steel pads, rather than just laying the handpiece/housing in place vertically as I did.)

2> Use a paper towel or cotton cloth cover on the pad/ contact, dampening it with a salt, 'lite salt', or epsom salt solution to give adequate conductivity & disperse the signal flow paths.

3> Add extra resistance in between the device and you: to limit maximum possible current flow; or operate at a reduced voltage without the added current limiting. If you have a device such as the Zapper HFA-4, which has an 'Output Power Adjust" control, use it to reduce the power to a comfortable level.

Why wasn't I using the new Zapper HFA-4 for this session? Because I was busy, running around, needing my hands free without disturbing the setting on the device. The Zapper HFA has two adjustments accessed with a mini screw driver through small holes in the main housing's cap; it was ergonomically optimized for Zapping on the run, so to speak, as there are no adjustments exposed to be knocked off their settings!

Personally, when something comes up that I need to deal with, I'm inclined to hit it hard & fast, right on the target frequency; that's why I'm building the 9 cell batteries that still fit in all of the Zappers I produce; that's also why I tend to Zap myself with higher current outputs- I've observed the waveforms as picked up at various points on the body while zapping, testing with higher & lower current outputs. The simple bottom line: I see a stronger waveform induced into the body when extra current limiting is not being used. Stronger induced resonance should result in more definite effects against pathogens- my theory to date.

My first session zapping at 15 volts, using two hand pieces, running 424 kHz (frequency for Giardia) left me feeling a 'vibrating' sensation all through my chest area for over two hours afterward....

I'm slowly working on a chapter (& web page) on contact pads, applications, and technical details; need to get it all collected into one place!

==================

The 1998 conference yielded some concerns that were a carry over from the previous conference. Questions about the type of device, protocols and their effectiveness, and the determination of MORs remain major concerns. Modification of the basic device still is a goal for some researchers and the development of tubes is high on the list. However, the continued development of the device and tubes cannot overcome the need to determine the MORs required for the various conditions. If the precise MOR is known, the result will be positive. Continued use of the square wave and harmonics has its limitations, primarily, because we don't know exactly what we have and need to determine its effectiveness.

A question often repeated was "Why do some devices work and other don't?" I don't think there is a simple answer. Every setup is different and the environment around it may be different. Also some have even said that the magnetic or geomagnetic surroundings have a significant effect. The comments go on and on, but no answers.

I have noticed that a cancer group device operating in the same place, orientation, and under the same conditions can be effective for some and not effective for some others. Within the same group I have found that some persons who have been taking herbs, minerals, and other alternatives for extended periods of time seem to be somewhat resistant to the device. I know this sounds controversial, but some persons who are not on such a regimen respond more positively. It could be that the microorganisms are capable of changing to a more resistant form. If this is true, then the MOR has changed and a new MOR is required. 

It also appears that some persons who under go Chemo are more resistant. A typical case was where the person was undergoing Chemo and no response was noted. It is a known fact that persons who under go Chemo often require changes in the Chemo protocol makeup. The bottom line is that there is no "Magic Bullet".

Some have reported that the same device seems to be effective one day and not effective the next. Some thing has changed, but who can say what was that change.

Some say the movement of the wires influence the results. 

Recent investigations reveal that in some cancer cases a distance of 3 - 5 feet is more effective than 6 to 8 feet. 

Dr Bare demonstrated various tubes. One in particularly was a super tube. It was 2 inches in diameter; 28 inches long, and filled with "H" gas to a 10 torr pressure. It will be interesting to see how this tube performs. 

Stan Truman reported to me that he had a coiled tube that looked like a spring. It is about 22 inches long and about 3 inches in diameter. The guy that made it said it was a real "Kicker". Time will tell.

We must continue to strive to be technically oriented to achieve a positive and creditable position. Some are attempting to find documentation that will satisfy those who are seeking a creditable position. Most Rife researchers are neither trained nor do they have the background to be able to accomplish such a feat. It is amazing that some do not like anecdotes that make up the majority of the data presented so far, but collectively, they present a creditable position. 

Most physicians cannot contribute to this cause, because they would suffer loss if they are involved with a non approved method. We need to be sensitive to their position and friendly, but we need to press on and achieve the goals that are before us. Conventional diagnostic methods and techniques are required to monitor the progress of every person with cancer. Physicians are the best source.

Some are seeking status, recognition, and monetary compensations. For those who can and are willing, they must press on toward the goal of just helping the helpless to help themselves.

The basic R/B device is still recommended as a good place to start. The estandard straight tube with 100% Argon or 10% Neon, 90% Argon gives good results with no loss of effectiveness based on over 1 yr. of experimentation. 

Some reduction in the volume or size of the unit can be achieved using the new switching power supplies. Most of them are under 5 lb. Tube wrapping remains a hot issue, but no one has presented any data to confirm improved results. It takes time to determine what if any improvements are being achieved. Here is an opportunity for the establishment of credibility for the work we are conducting.

The passage of time has proven the merits of the basic device to help persons to overcome many physical problems. Some would like to have a place on the Rife-List where every frequency and every condition is laid out to help to achieve standard results. As we progress, that may happen but there still remain differences in equipment and operational procedures that vary from individual to individual. Also, because every person does not have the same physical conditions and bodily requirements, the protocols will continue to be varied.

Modifications to the Uniden Pro 510 XL, per Jim Bares "Manual", consist of cutting D-14 diode, R-93 resistor, removal of solder bridge, removal of small capacitor near the word "RED", replacement of 0.47 capacitor with 0.68 uf 50 volt electrolytic, replacement of L8 with a 220 ohm resistor, installation of a 2SC1969 transistor, installation of a heat sink, and finally, adjustment of L6 inductor coil. 

Results showed no significant changes with these extensive Uniden modifications. Power level has been raised to 50 to 100 watts. SWRs will continue to range from 1.0 to 2.0. Cooling of all components is the key for reliable extended operation.

Tube shapes, standard leaded glass, 22" long or U tube made from 22" long tube with 100% argon. Lighting of the tubes is easy. In some cases a propane gas lighter is used. Robert Randazzo made these tubes.

A borrowed bubble tube was under study, but it broke. Two Phanotron tubes were evaluated. A standard tube with a bubble and a straight Phanotron with no bubble. Both tubes are very easy to light and they require no adjustment of tuner. The straight tube was made to fit into a small case for portability. Bill Cheb made both tubes. Both of these tubes appear to be effective in operation and in the results achieved.

I brought back a Cheb 22" long bubble tube with a "getter" from the Conference. It runs amazingly cool and appears to be effective. I came back with a slight tickle in my throat and after running the bubble tube, the condition was relieved. I used 727, 787, 880 1550, 10 min each. I used the wire cloth on the tube ends. The whole tube lights up from end to end. 

¼" wire cloth, 2.5 inches long, is used on ends of standard tubes. (Not over electrodes.) Some tube connections is by 14 gauge bare copper coils with 4 turns each. Coils are wound CCW and CW. Coils are placed approximately. 4" from the tips of tube.

Connection to coils is by 18 gauge stranded wire, 9 to 12 inches long and that are attached to the outside ends of the coils. Wire lugs are soldered to the ends that connect to the Balun or Tuner.

The Balun used are an Amidon Torrid Balun Kit or MFJ 912.

Coax RG58/U connections, CB (6") to Palomar and Palomar (12") to Tuner are kept as short as possible.

Palomar, Blue faced and Black faced, work equally as well with no overheating problems, provided adequate cooling is provided. Fan on top and on bottom will keep them cool. 

Power to Kinnaman is provided from CB through pin #4. The 110-vac transformer is not used in this case. 

For the F1C Kinnaman, it may be best to use the 110-vac transformer and connect it to a separate wall outlet and not to the power tap used for the other components to avoid or reduce RF interference.

The Kinnaman frequency generator provides smooth uninterrupted operation for the whole exposure session. Gated mode, 4Hz, used for all sessions. Use of 10 and 20Hz are also being explored. Use of a "PULSER" can be utilized to pulse the tube completely off and on to achieve more effective results. The PULSER can be easily constructed using a "Burton" schematic. The schematic is available on Stan Truman's web page.

A deviation of 2 to 10 is used for all frequencies. I understand this unit produces random frequencies. I have seen improved results in some cases using 10 Hz.

All Kinnaman F1A, F1B, F1C have a gated mode and all models are effective. The latest Version, F1C, allows one to eliminate the 12-second pause between programmed frequencies.

I normally set the Gated mode for the Kinnaman for 4 Hz. 

I brought an EMEM-2 device to the Conference and several people tried it. 2 persons had Lyme disease and one of them said on the following day that they felt better. The EMEM-2 device has demonstrated positive results with volunteers that have Lyme and parasites. The device only weighs 11 lb. and is very portable.

Experiments with the R/R unit has been showing improved results using a modified procedure, 3 sec on and 2 sec off, as compared to the original recommended procedure of 0.75 sec on and 0.1 sec off. Also the sweeping of the frequencies during the exposures appears to enhance the effects. Pulsing the tube completely off and on definitely is more effective. Continued research with this device is continuing.

Some results with this device has been dramatic, one volunteer experienced a tumor discharge within 24 hours. Exposure rate was approximately ½ millisecond. This timing was for an individual frequency during a sweep mode.

I have taken up a task of the determination of required MORs. I hope by the end of the year, that I will be able to post some results. 

MOR detection can be determined using the Hulda Clark Synchrometer. Since this is a group effort, I am opening the way for others to investigate this area. It is possible to determine MORs with volunteers with physical conditions or by the use of specimens of organisms. Using the Synchrometer and established MORs, it is a simple matter to determine if a person has such an organism, or parasite within their body.

Despite the failures of others to effectively operate the Synchrometer, I have found it to be very reliable. I have modified a radio to be able to pass the 2MHz my Lodestar puts out and therefore, all the frequencies reported by Dr Clark are available for use. It has been shown by Dr Clark that a sine wave is effective in the elimination of a single organism. I believe that Dr Rife was targeting a single organism or a single virus (BX). Thus, it should be now possible for us to duplicate those results using the Synchrometer as opposed to a microscope. Of course, Dr Clark does not report any cancer MORs, but her reasons for that is the influence of parasites and chemical toxins. If the rational of the operation of the Synchrometer holds up, one should be able to effectively determine the MOR of any microorganism by observation of resonance for that organism. 

I have found in most cases a family member or friend is required for a terminally ill person to assure that they are following the protocol. The use of the R/B by terminal cancer cases requires supervision. In general they do not have the frame of mind to make the rational judgements required.

In many situations, the person may be in the last stages of their disease. Generally, after surgery, Chemo, and radiation considerable damage to the body has occurred. It is never too late to help, but the effort may only be to help relieve the suffering and pain associated with the cancer. Remember, it is their responsibility, not yours. 

The use of herbs and minerals can in some cases achieve what nothing else can. I keep hearing situations where herbs were responsible for the person's recovery. Often these thing are synergistic or they work together to achieve the goal of good health.

We have been conditioned to use drugs as opposed to "Grandma's" remedy! The trees and herbs are disappearing form our neighborhoods, so we have to import them from where ever we can. Remember that every one is different and what works for one will not work for another.

You need to find a good herb source and a Naturopath. However, you need to query them as to their success as in the case of a conventional doctor.

Paul

==================

The following volunteers were chosen , because they were not experiencing any responses to the R/B after 60 days. All volunteers have cancer.

Volunteer #1 Standard frequency for three separate exposures with 72 hours between exposures, 3 minutes, 6 minutes, and 9 minutes for 0.75 " on, 0.1" off. Volunteer #1 had suffered lowering of voice preventing singing due to medication. Volunteer's voice returned to normal after last exposure. Otherwise there were no responses.


Volunteer #2 Standard frequency for 3 separate exposures with 72 hours between exposures of 3 minutes, 4 minutes, 6 minutes Volunteer experienced some sensation in breast tumor briefly, but had no other responses. 

Volunteer #3 Standard frequency for 3 minutes with 3 seconds on and 2 seconds off, followed by a negative scan (-7,000 Hz) for 3 minutes resulted in a vaginal brownish discharge mixed with blood within 24 hours. Volunteer experienced no responses during exposures.

Volunteers #1 and #2 are experiencing positive responses to EMEM2. Experienced positive Detox using EMEM2. Volunteer #1 is continuing R/B and EMEM2. 

Volunteer #2 is continuing R/B and EMEM2. Experiencing very positive Detox using EMEM2.

Volunteer #3 did not respond to EMEM2. #3 is continuing R/B and R/R.

Volunteers #1 and #2 will use R/R with modified pulse timing ans sweep function in the near future..

No response with R/R has been experienced or observed by myself while exposed simultaneously with all volunteers and separately conducted experiments. Total accumulative exposure time, 55 minutes. Longest continous exposure, 15 minutes. I continue to have no responses to the "R/B Wave. I also did not experience any responses to the EMEM2. 

Symptomatic technique remains the primary means of determining the effectiveness of all these devices or their components. It is important not to mix or interact too many variables inorder to be able to define what progress is being achieved by what device. Proper timing is required to be able to separate the different stimuli and responses. 

Device is Mirage radio (MX 2950 EX) with standard freq range (24 - 30 MHz). Setup, is per Cisco's original post! Modified Pulse timing is per RR's posting. Complete unit is installed in a small suitcase. Phanotron Tube with helium gas from Cheb. Samlex SEC 1223 power supply. Cobra 250 linear amp. MFJ 971 Tuner. Two short coax cables. PULSER. Wires to Phanotron are 2 Monster Speaker Cables, 15" long. Uniden 510 can be setup to input frequencies if needed.

The Pulser consists of 2 timers and 2 switches installed in a plastic box, 2"x4"x6". One momentary push button SPST and one push button DPDT. The pulser is completely variable from seconds to hours. I used a modified BURTON PULSER MODEL BP-5 schematic from Stan Truman's Web.

The scan is semiautomatic and is controlled by a separate switch. Sweep can be set for (+) OR (-) SWEEP. No USB and LSB have been used at this time.

Paul

===================

INDUCTION TECHNIQUE

Various Gizmos, such as Pad devices, Zappers, EMEM-1, EMEM-2, and plate connected to the R/B at the Tuner ground connection to induce various frequencies into the body. EMF potentials can be measured between the plates and the person exposed to an R/B device.

A recent post stated that a pad device with an EMF of over 100-volt, but with limited amperage was used to reduce the size of a breast tumor. 

A post of a pad device was used successfully for prostate cancer.

Reports of positive results have been reported form time to time and it appears that lately it is surfacing again with the R/B. The use of pads or bands, in my opinion, can be used effectively to increase the effectiveness of the frequency. There are others on the list that has suggested the use of such devices.

Stan Truman, suggested, I installed a footplate connected to the ground on the tuner. I felt a slight tingling sensation in my feet. 

It seems that we are looking for more power, but it may be as simple as using a pad or plate in connection with the R/B. 

The R/B with the Plate attached to the tuner ground connection will result in responses when the feet are placed on the plated during operation.

The EMEM-1 and EMEM-2 both have plates for the feet and hands are placed on the tube to enhance the induction of the frequency. The EMEM-2 has a copper tape that is wound around one side of the tube. One places one hand over the copper tape to connect the circuit.

The EMEM-2 has a hand held plate or pads that replaces the use of hands on the tube. The pad is placed directly over the area of concern. So far, the use of this pad has produced responses where other gizmos did not. The EMF measured between the pad and the person was about 90 to 110 volts.

The Zapper is well known for its effects and the placement of the electrodes can greatly influence the results. 

We are going to bigger and bigger size tubes with the R/B to try and get more power. This is simply a technique to increase power associated with the induced frequency.

Just as the R/B, R/R, etc may be compatible and synergistic when used together, so foot plates and pads should be considered.

The sine, spiked, and square waves are all capable of killing microorganism if the correct frequency is known. We are in a sense still shooting in the dark with a shotgun approach. There is a need for a device that is capable of determining the specific MOR required for a specific microorganism. In the meantime, we need to employ or use all the Gizmos.

Dick Loyd has done a fine job of summarizing the Gizmos available and how they are used.

Paul

===================

Continued use of R/R by #3 volunteer has resulted in cessation of the discharge that was initiated by the initial exposure to the R/R with the new pulse. This is a positive response, since #3 was completely un